I felt really low yesterday, which made me realize I've been on a bit of a high ever since I landed my current job. That has revitalized me professionally and personally and was really the start of a lucky streak. Then I was blessed with a beautiful baby girl, and daily have been rediscovering the beauty of sisters, motherhood and a full family life.
Admittedly there was a bit of me that felt like I couldn't fail at anything. Sure I had wee meltdowns, grumpy times, and new mother irritability, but overall I've felt HAPPY and on top of my game.
Then yesterday I got a blow. I thought I had nailed an interview and would likely be chosen to teach a different course in a different department. I'm usually sensitive to underlying ripples or nuances when things are a little "off", not quite right, something is going on behind the scenes, someone isn't who they make out to be, there is an underlying current of something..animosity, pretension, tension, insecurity, awkwardness, sadness..something. But I left the interview feeling confident and pleased. Did I miss something?
"Could you tell me where my shortcomings were please?"
Long pause...
"You could have tightened up your lesson."
"OK"
"Just tightened it up".
"Anything specific?"
"It could have been more age-appropriate, more business appropriate. There was some arguing back and forth and it was interactive so it wasn't a total disaster".
...NOT A TOTAL DISASTER?? What? This is the feedback I get for a lesson I thought long and hard about. It's not something I just coughed up on a tissue. OK, I felt like crap. Surprised and confused, yes, and disappointed, of course.
I could have gone with a more conventional lesson, but I chose to do something hands on and experiential. I took a risk, but it was a calculated one. Knowing my students would be mostly returning from school after a long hiatus and maybe felt some trepidation, I chose to reflect this in my lesson, by making it fun, accessible, common place, relevant and - hopefully - memorable. My teaching of the mathematical nuts and bolts was explained concisely (it's what I do) and it's application (to mixing and taste testing OJ) hands-on. Calories were calculated and a grocery shopping applications were made all using ratios (the topic). Yes it wasn't strong in the business aspect - that I could agree on, but not age-appropriate, a total disaster? My grown-up panelists were laughing and having fun with the lesson, I swear. Was I on drugs, was I not perceiving the room as it was? A philosophical aspect of my profession was being challenged.
So the next day, my usual enthusiasm for work somewhat paled, I sought more feedback. Afterall "there was some arguing back and forth" (ie. there was some discussion and disagreement) and "needed to be tightened up" (ie....needed more flow? needed to be more consise/coherent? ??) does not describe the language of an overly-eloquent individual.
The feedback I got from another panelist has given me some closure. My interview was very strong and that in her opinion I was one of the strongest candidates. A stronger business background would have helped me, and she would like the chance to work with me in the future. Short, sweet, simple. Thank you.
That is all that needed to be said. I can be at peace with this experience. I won't stop trying to make math fun. It is. And I won't stop putting what I think is my best foot forward.